IRBY, KIHRIESHA v. CLAIBORNE MANAGEMENT LLC

2025 TN WC 1
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJanuary 21, 2025
Docket2024-80-4694
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 1 (IRBY, KIHRIESHA v. CLAIBORNE MANAGEMENT LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
IRBY, KIHRIESHA v. CLAIBORNE MANAGEMENT LLC, 2025 TN WC 1 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Jan 21, 2025 11:34 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

KIHRIESHA IRBY, ) Docket No. 2024-80-4694 Employee, ) v. ) CLAIBORNE MANAGEMENT LLC, ) State File No. 42226-2024 Employer, ) And ) TECHNOLOGY INS. CO., ) Judge Shaterra R. Marion Carrier. ) ) ____________________________________________________________________________ EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING MEDICAL BENEFITS

The Court held an expedited hearing on January 13, 2025. Ms. Irby requested orthopedic treatment for a May 10, 2024 right shoulder and back injury. Claiborne argued that it rightfully denied her referral due to a pre-existing condition. The Court holds that Ms. Irby is entitled to the benefits recommended by her authorized treating physician.

History of Claim

In 2021, while working in Mississippi, Ms. Irby suffered a right shoulder injury. An MRI and x-ray showed evidence of rotator cuff impingement and a possible SLAP tear. She received injections and underwent physical therapy before reaching maximum medical improvement with a 0% impairment rating in May 2022. After settling her claim, she returned to the doctor sometime in 2022 or 2023 with right shoulder pain, but she did not receive further treatment.

In April 2024, Ms. Irby was in a motor vehicle accident. She testified that the doctor diagnosed her with a back strain, but not a shoulder injury. 1 She said her doctor returned her to work on May 9, one day before her work injury.

1 The parties did not submit medical records related to her motor vehicle accident. Ms. Irby testified that on May 10, as she helped a patient get out of bed, the patient slipped and fell. The patient jerked Ms. Irby, and she felt a sharp pain go from her right shoulder down to her back. She said the sensation was similar to what she felt during her Mississippi work injury in 2021.

Ms. Irby began treatment with Care Now, after selecting them from a panel. The medical records note that she had a similar problem in the past, but a lifting incident at work caused this current onset. Care Now diagnosed her with a muscle strain, referred her to physical therapy, and ordered an MRI. The MRI did not show a rotator cuff or labral tear but noted the assessment was limited due to a lack of contrast.

Care Now discussed the importance of an orthopedic follow-up for Ms. Irby, referred her to Elite Orthopedics, and ordered an MRI with contrast. Claiborne denied the MRI and the direct orthopedic referral. Care Now put Ms. Irby on light duty, and Claiborne complied with those restrictions.

Claiborne’s administrator, who testified, said she did not witness the injury but did not dispute it occurred. She said Ms. Irby could not do her initial light-duty assignment of feeding the residents because she could not lift her arm from shoulder pain.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Evidentiary Ruling

Claiborne sought to introduce the first report of injury into evidence. Ms. Irby objected, stating the statute makes it inadmissible.

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-3-702(a)(5) states that the first report shall not be used in any judicial proceeding.

Therefore, the first report of injury is not introduced as evidence. It is marked for identification purposes only as exhibit four.

Analysis and Decision

Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-102(13) states that an aggravation of a preexisting condition is a compensable injury when "it can be shown to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the aggravation arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment." However, Ms. Irby need not prove each and every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence at an expedited hearing to receive medical benefits, but must present sufficient evidence from which the court can conclude that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Ms. Irby testified that she did not injure her shoulder in the April car accident. Further, she said she had no shoulder pain and no difficulties performing her job duties before the 2024 work accident. Claiborne offered no evidence to dispute any of this testimony. Additionally, Claiborne’s administrator testified that she does not dispute that the incident occurred.

Treatment recommended by an authorized treating physician “shall be presumed to be medically necessary for treatment of the injured employee.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 204(a)(3)(H). Here, the authorized treating physician was aware of her earlier shoulder injury but noted the recent work injury caused her current onset. Further, they recommended an MRI with contrast and made a direct orthopedic referral.

Claiborne argued that the MRI taken after her injury showed no anatomical change since her 2021 injury. However, no medical testimony supports their assertion.

“Judges are not well-suited to make independent medical determinations without expert medical testimony supporting such a determination.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 8, at *17 (Feb. 14, 2018). “Likewise, parties and their lawyers cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments.” Id.

Therefore, the Court holds that Ms. Irby is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits, and she is entitled to reasonable and necessary medical treatment as recommended by the authorized treating physician.

Attorney’s Fees

Ms. Irby requested attorney’s fees for Claiborne’s alleged wrongful denial. Claiborne pointed out that the dispute certification notice did not list attorney’s fees as an issue.

Tennessee Code Annotated Section 50-6-203 requires a mediator to certify an issue before it can be heard before a workers’ compensation judge.

Ms. Irby acknowledged the dispute certification notice did not contain attorney’s fees as an issue, and that she did not file a motion to amend the dispute certification notice. The Court therefore denies the request for attorney’s fees at this time.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Irby’s request for reasonable and necessary medical treatment authorized by the authorized treating physician is granted. 2. Ms. Irby’s request for attorney’s fees is denied at this time.

3. The court sets a status conference for March 31, 2025, 10:30 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call (866) 943-0014 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

4. Unless an interlocutory appeal of the Expedited Hearing Order is filed, compliance with this Order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this Order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3). The Employer must submit confirmation of compliance with this Order to the Bureau by email to WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov no later than the seventh business day after entry of this Order. Failure to submit confirmation within seven business days may result in a penalty assessment for non-compliance. For questions as to compliance, contact the Workers’ Compensation Compliance Unit by email at WCCompliance.Program@tn.gov.

ENTERED January 21, 2025.

________________________________________ Judge Shaterra R. Marion Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX Exhibits:

1. Work Status Reports for Ms. Irby 2. Medical Records 3. Email with Carrier’s Acknowledgement of Notice 4. [For Identification Only] First Report of Injury 5. Ms. Irby’s Choice of Physician Form 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(3)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irby-kihriesha-v-claiborne-management-llc-tennworkcompcl-2025.