Irby D. Stephens v. United States
This text of 383 F.2d 428 (Irby D. Stephens v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant attacks a Dyer Act conviction (18 U.S.C. § 2312) for which sentence under the Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 5010(b)) was imposed, allegedly without full disclosure by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence that could be imposed under that Act. The question seems to be the same as that presented by Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960. On the basis of that decision, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing as to whether appellant was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.
Vacated and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 F.2d 428, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irby-d-stephens-v-united-states-ca5-1967.