Irby D. Stephens v. United States

383 F.2d 428, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 6, 1967·No. 24513_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant attacks a Dyer Act conviction (18 U.S.C. § 2312) for which sentence under the Youth Corrections Act (18 U.S.C. § 5010(b)) was imposed, allegedly without full disclosure by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence that could be imposed under that Act. The question seems to be the same as that presented by Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960. On the basis of that decision, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing as to whether appellant was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.

Vacated and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irby D. Stephens v. United States, 383 F.2d 428, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4935 (5th Cir. 1967).

383 F.2d 428 (Irby D. Stephens v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry Gilbert Abernathy v. United States
418 F.2d 288 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Richard Gonzalez James v. United States
388 F.2d 453 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)