Ira Tucker v. United States

278 F.2d 721, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ira Tucker v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 F.2d 62
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 27, 1960·No. 17993·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of possession of moonshine liquor. He appeals, saying the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Across the street from appellant’s residence is a “jook”, the Moonlight Club, operated by appellant’s wife with some help from him. Behind the Club was an open tract supposedly owned by a person identified only as “Pete the Tailor”. The appellant and two others were each permitted to keep hogs in separate pens on these premises and each had a nearby cooking machine for preparing food for his hogs. A deputy sheriff found nine gallon jugs of unstamped whiskey near the appellant’s cooking machine. The appellant was charged with its possession. The deputy testified that he had taken moonshine “off a lot of customers at the jook.” No more than this was adduced to identify the appellant with the liquor. It is not enough. No control or dominion of the contraband by the appellant is shown. Construing the evidence most favorably to the verdict, we conclude it does not sustain a verdict of guilt. The court should have directed an acquittal of the appellant. The judgment and sentence of the district court is reversed and a judgment of acquittal is here rendered for the appellant.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ira Tucker v. United States, 278 F.2d 721, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4458 (5th Cir. 1960).

278 F.2d 721 (Ira Tucker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.