Ira G. Katz, Inc. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 579
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1957
DocketReap. Dec. 8733; Entry No. 807539, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 579 (Ira G. Katz, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ira G. Katz, Inc. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 579 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have beep submitted [580]*580for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States are the appraised values. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeals to Reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed, facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ira-g-katz-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.