Ira Furman Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ira Furman Co. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 514, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2119

United States Customs Court·Decided June 3, 1954·No. No. 58139; protest 174907-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy is metal scrap, to wit, nonferrous metal scrap containing nickel, copper, and zinc, and articles of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value; that the material is secondhand, waste, or refuse; and that it is obsolete, defective, or damaged and is fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy is metal scrap, to wit, nonferrous metal scrap containing nickel, copper, and zinc, and articles of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value; that the material is secondhand, waste, or refuse; and that it is obsolete, defective, or damaged and is fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Ira Furman Co. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 514, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2119 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

32 Cust. Ct. 514 (Ira Furman Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.