IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.

S.D. California

IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.

DecidedMarch 22, 2022

Docket3:21-cv-02081

StatusUnknown

This text of IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. (IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | IQVIA INC., a Delaware corporation; Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB and IQVIA AG, a Swiss company, 12 ORDER GRANTING 3 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO y FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 14 , SEAL MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE 15 | SYSTEMS, INC., a California [ECF No. 34] corporation; and DALE BROWN, 16 || individually, 17 Defendants. Judge: The Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

1 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Seal Documents in Support of 2 || Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion to Seal’’). (ECF No. 34.) The Motion 3 || to Seal seeks to seal from the public view the following documents: 4 e Portions of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil 5 || Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”); and 6 e Certain exhibits or portions of exhibits attached to the Declaration of 7 || Jennifer Bennett filed concurrently in support of the Motion (the “Bennett 8 || Exhibits”). 9 Compelling reasons exist here to file under seal the requested portions of the 10 || Motion and the Bennett Exhibits. Defendants seek to seal documents or references 11 | to documents submitted in a prior arbitration under the rules of the DIFC-LCIA 12 | Arbitration Centre, which require arbitration submissions to remain confidential. 13 || Defendants also seek to seal documents and references to documents that were 14 | produced and subject to a protective order in a related case. Additionally, the 15 || information to be sealed implicates the parties’ sensitive business information, 16 || including trade secrets purportedly owned by Plaintiffs IQVIA Inc. and IQVIA AG; 17 || and Defendants’ nonpublic prospective customers and confidential business 18 || strategies, projects, and products. The disclosure of this information would risk 19 || substantially harming or prejudicing Plaintiffs and Defendants. See McArdle v. 20 || AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 09-cv-1117, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218070, at *13-14 21 || (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2018). 22 Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that there are compelling reasons to 23 || GRANT the Motion to Seal. It is ORDERED that portions of the Motion and the 24 || identified Bennett Exhibits shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 06 Dated: March 22, 2022 7 sale As ( 27 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 28 United States District Judge

Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | IQVIA INC., a Delaware corporation; Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB and IQVIA AG, a Swiss company, 12 ORDER GRANTING 3 Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO y FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER 14 , SEAL MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE 15 | SYSTEMS, INC., a California [ECF No. 34] corporation; and DALE BROWN, 16 || individually, 17 Defendants. Judge: The Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

1 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Seal Documents in Support of 2 || Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion to Seal’’). (ECF No. 34.) The Motion 3 || to Seal seeks to seal from the public view the following documents: 4 e Portions of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil 5 || Procedure 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”); and 6 e Certain exhibits or portions of exhibits attached to the Declaration of 7 || Jennifer Bennett filed concurrently in support of the Motion (the “Bennett 8 || Exhibits”). 9 Compelling reasons exist here to file under seal the requested portions of the 10 || Motion and the Bennett Exhibits. Defendants seek to seal documents or references 11 | to documents submitted in a prior arbitration under the rules of the DIFC-LCIA 12 | Arbitration Centre, which require arbitration submissions to remain confidential. 13 || Defendants also seek to seal documents and references to documents that were 14 | produced and subject to a protective order in a related case. Additionally, the 15 || information to be sealed implicates the parties’ sensitive business information, 16 || including trade secrets purportedly owned by Plaintiffs IQVIA Inc. and IQVIA AG; 17 || and Defendants’ nonpublic prospective customers and confidential business 18 || strategies, projects, and products. The disclosure of this information would risk 19 || substantially harming or prejudicing Plaintiffs and Defendants. See McArdle v. 20 || AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 09-cv-1117, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218070, at *13-14 21 || (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2018). 22 Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that there are compelling reasons to 23 || GRANT the Motion to Seal. It is ORDERED that portions of the Motion and the 24 || identified Bennett Exhibits shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 06 Dated: March 22, 2022 7 sale As ( 27 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 28 United States District Judge

Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 3:21-cv-02081-GPC-DEB

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iqvia-inc-v-medimpact-healthcare-systems-inc-casd-2022.