I.Q. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 2017·No. 5D16-563·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

I.Q., A CHILD,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-563

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. ________________________________/

Opinion filed January 13, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Sally D.M. Kest, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Brittany N. O’Neil, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appealed order except that we strike from the order the language

that requires Appellant “to get a job within 30 days” and to “provide proof of job search at

status hearing.” We remand for the entry of an amended order.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I.Q. v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

I.Q. v. State (I.Q. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.