Ipsaro v. Material Drivers' Union

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Ipsaro v. Material Drivers' Union

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1783

CourtCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

DecidedMay 9, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490 (Ipsaro v. Material Drivers' Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ipsaro v. Material Drivers' Union, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1783 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

Epitomized Opinion

This action was brought by one Ipsaro for an injunction against the Material Drivers’ Union of Cleveland. The complainant alleged that he was a non-union man and that he operated a truck for a living. He further claimed that after a strike was called by the Cleveland drivers he paid a walking delegate $12.50 for a permit to haul material between May 1 and May 15. He also claimed that he had been threatened and intimidated and asked that the Union members be restrained from intrfering with the non-union men. In granting the injunction, James S. Thomas of Portsmouth, Ohio, held:

1. That the member of the' Labor Union must be restrained from interfering -with the non-union men in the performance of their duties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMAS, J.

Epitomized Opinion

This action was brought by one Ipsaro for an injunction against the Material Drivers’ Union of Cleveland. The complainant alleged that he was a non-union man and that he operated a truck for a living. He further claimed that after a strike was called by the Cleveland drivers he paid a walking delegate $12.50 for a permit to haul material between May 1 and May 15. He also claimed that he had been threatened and intimidated and asked that the Union members be restrained from intrfering with the non-union men. In granting the injunction, James S. Thomas of Portsmouth, Ohio, held:

1. That the member of the' Labor Union must be restrained from interfering -with the non-union men in the performance of their duties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 490, 1923 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ipsaro-v-material-drivers-union-ohctcomplcuyaho-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack