Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 861 F.3d 1362
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 21, 2017·No. 16-1474·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

August 21, 2017

ERRATA ______________________

Appeal No. 2016-1474

IPCOM GMBH & CO., Appellant

v.

HTC CORPORATION, Appellee

Decided: July 7, 2017 ______________________

Please make the following changes: One page 2, lines 16–17, change “IPCom amended claims 1, 5–26, and 28–37, 1 but the Board found that these amended claims were obvious” to “IPCom amended claims 5, 12, 16, 18, 23, 25, 30, and 34. Those amendments effectively amended the scope of claims 5–18, 23, 25–26, and 28–37. 2 In its second review, the Board found that all the pending claims were obvious”

1 IPCom cancelled claim 27. J.A. 3. 2 IPCom cancelled claim 27. J.A. 3. 2 IPCOM GMBH & CO. v. HTC CORPORATION

On page 24, lines 19–20, change “amended these claims, and HTC responded that the amended claims were un- patentable” to “amended several of the claims, and HTC responded that all the claims were unpatentable.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc Corporation (Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.