IP Solutions, Inc. v. Central Sierra Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IP SOLUTIONS, INC., No. 1:21-cv-01391-JLT-SKO
12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 CENTRAL SIERRA HOLDINGS, INC., (Doc. 31) 15 Defendant. 16
17 18 On June 13, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. 19 (Doc. 31.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: June 14, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IP Solutions, Inc. v. Central Sierra Holdings, Inc. (IP Solutions, Inc. v. Central Sierra Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.