IP Investors Group LLC v. Sedicii Innovations Limited
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IPINVESTORSGROUPILG. SSS
Plaintiff, -against- 23 CIVIL 1094 (PAE) JUDGMENT SEDICII INNOVATIONS LIMITED, ET AL., Defendant. □□□ K
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated February 22, 2024, having so found, the Court, consistent with this request and governing legal authority, dismisses the action for lack of Article II standing, without prejudice to filing an amended complaint or new lawsuit. See Carter v. HealthPort Techs., LLC, 822 F.3d 47, 54 (2d Cir. 2016) ("[W]here a complaint is dismissed for lack of Article III standing, the dismissal must be without prejudice[.]"). A new such pleading may attempt to fortify the claim of organizational standing, or, as the FAC envisioned, bring claims on behalf of IP Investors’ members. In the event an amended complaint is filed, the Court's intention would be to put in place an expedited schedule for briefing any motion to dismiss. Dated: New York, New York February 23, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court
BY: ER Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IP Investors Group LLC v. Sedicii Innovations Limited (IP Investors Group LLC v. Sedicii Innovations Limited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.