Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 25, 2021·No. 1:17-cv-06221·Unknown

Opinion

quinn emanuel trial lawyers | new york COHEN MILSTEIN

October 22, 2021 VIA ECF Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Room 1670 New York, NY 10007 Re: Iowa Pub. Emps.’ Ret. Sys. et al. v. Bank of Am. Corp. et al., No. 17-cv-6221 (KPF) Dear Judge Cave: Plaintiffs respectfully request leave to file their letter-reply in support of Plaintiffs’ letter- motion for reconsideration (ECF 478) of the Court’s order granting in part Defendants’ letter- motion requesting leave to file a sur-reply (ECF 476) with redactions to references to confidential material, pursuant to paragraph I.G of this Court’s Individual Rules of Practice. Plaintiffs request to file their letter-reply in redacted form as it contains references to expert materials and documents that have already been, or will be, filed under seal or in redacted form pursuant to sealing orders issued by Judge Failla and have been designated as Highly Confidential or Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order in this case (ECF 150). See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (recognizing that the Court must “balance competing considerations against [the presumption of access],” including but not limited to “the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure”) (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995)). Defendants’ likewise sought leave to file their letter-motion and letter- opposition with redactions (ECF 472, 479), and the Court granted their requests (ECF 474, 482). Respectfully submitted, Plaintiffs’ letter-motion (ECF No. 485) requesting to redact Michael B. Eisenkraft confidential materials from their letter-reply (ECF No. 486) Michael B. Eisenkraft is GRANTED, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL limit access to ECF No. 486 to Court users and the case PLLC participants. Plaintiffs shall promptly file on ECF a redacted version of ECF No. 486. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 485. SO ORDERED 10/25/2021

ay / / □ ral Ze (anal L. CAYE ~United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation (Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System v. Bank of America Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Amodeo
71 F.3d 1044 (Second Circuit, 1995)
Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)