Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lopez

444 So. 2d 1021, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11419
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 1984·No. Nos. 82-2637, 83-544·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The orders under review in these consolidated appeals dismissing the appellant’s amended third-party complaint for indemnity, contribution and professional malpractice are affirmed. As the appellant now concedes, no cause of action for indemnity lies under the principles laid down in Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So.2d 490 (Fla.1979). Likewise, because the plaintiff’s bad faith claim against Iowa Mutual is an action ex contractu rather than a tort, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. McNulty, 229 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1969), Iowa’s third-party claim against Lynn for contribution among tortfeasors cannot lie. Finally, although Iowa may sue Lynn for professional malpractice, this claim must be brought in an independent action rather than, as here, in a third-party complaint. Accordingly, the dismissal of the claims for indemnity and contribution is affirmed; the dismissal of appellant’s claim for professional malpractice is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant instituting an independent action based on such claim.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lopez, 444 So. 2d 1021, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 1021 (Iowa Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Viera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust
73 So. 3d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Thatcher v. Waite
505 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)