Iowa City State Bank v. Stovall

110 S.E. 25, 27 Ga. App. 821, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 452
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1921
Docket12551
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 25 (Iowa City State Bank v. Stovall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Iowa City State Bank v. Stovall, 110 S.E. 25, 27 Ga. App. 821, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 452 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

The first grant of a .new trial will not be disturbed, except where the record affirmatively shows that the verdict rendered represents the only result legally possible in the case. Since, under the testimony adduced, the jury could have found that the plaintiff’s title to the notes sued on was acquired after their maturity, the defendant was entitled to prove, if he could, the equities pleaded as a defense under the contract made with the original payee.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 25, 27 Ga. App. 821, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iowa-city-state-bank-v-stovall-gactapp-1921.