Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction
675 A.2d 456, 237 Conn. 910, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 182
This text of 675 A.2d 456 (Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction, 675 A.2d 456, 237 Conn. 910, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 182 (Colo. 1996).
Opinion
The petitioner Michael Iovieno’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 40 Conn. App. 553 (AC 14077), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the second habeas court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant a new ten day period to appeal from the judgment of the first habeas court?
“2. If the answer to the first question is no, did the Appellate Court nonetheless reach the proper result because of the petitioner’s failure to establish prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction
699 A.2d 1003 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 A.2d 456, 237 Conn. 910, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iovieno-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-1996.