Iorizzo v. Dyker Emergency Physicians, P. C.

278 A.D.2d 280, 718 N.Y.S.2d 215, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 280 (Iorizzo v. Dyker Emergency Physicians, P. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Iorizzo v. Dyker Emergency Physicians, P. C., 278 A.D.2d 280, 718 N.Y.S.2d 215, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated August 2, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendants Kasthuri Issack and Frank Lacqua and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The injured plaintiff’s insurance claim form was admitted into evidence without objection. Consequently, the question of whether there was a proper foundation for its admission is unpreserved for appellate review.

The trial court’s issuance of a missing witness charge with respect to the injured plaintiff’s treating physician was a provident exercise of discretion (see, Dukes v Rotem, 191 AD2d 35; Kupfer v Dalton, 169 AD2d 819; cf, Kasman v Flushing Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 224 AD2d 590; Coningsby v Marabell, 214 AD2d 949). Ritter, J. P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDowell v. Eagle Trans. Corp.
303 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 280, 718 N.Y.S.2d 215, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/iorizzo-v-dyker-emergency-physicians-p-c-nyappdiv-2000.