I.O. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

I.O. v. State

616 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4159, 1993 WL 108109

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1993

DocketNo. 92-954

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 197 (I.O. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

I.O. v. State, 616 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4159, 1993 WL 108109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on (1) the controlling and factually indistinguishable authority of J.A. v. State, 593 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) and In re J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and (2) the supporting case law cited in J.A. and J. C.D., the adjudication of juvenile delinquency for manslaughter by culpable negligence [§ 782.07, Fla.Stat. (1991)] under review is reversed in this tragically careless, but not culpably negligent, accidental shooting by the respondent I.O. of a classmate-friend, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the respondent I.O. from the cause. As in J.A. and J.C.D., I.O. may have been guilty of simple or gross negligence in this incident, but his conduct does not rise to the level of culpable negligence so as to constitute manslaughter as defined by Florida case law. See, e.g., Preston v. State, 56 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla.1952).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on (1) the controlling and factually indistinguishable authority of J.A. v. State, 593 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) and In re J.C.D., 598 So.2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and (2) the supporting case law cited in J.A. and J. C.D., the adjudication of juvenile delinquency for manslaughter by culpable negligence [§ 782.07, Fla.Stat. (1991)] under review is reversed in this tragically careless, but not culpably negligent, accidental shooting by the respondent I.O. of a classmate-friend, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the respondent I.O. from the cause. As in J.A. and J.C.D., I.O. may have been guilty of simple or gross negligence in this incident, but his conduct does not rise to the level of culpable negligence so as to constitute manslaughter as defined by Florida case law. See, e.g., Preston v. State, 56 So.2d 543, 544 (Fla.1952).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 197, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4159, 1993 WL 108109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/io-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack