Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Inzerillo v. City of New York

Inzerillo v. City of New York

287 A.D.2d 599, 731 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as [600]*600limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated December 4, 2000, as denied her motion, in effect, for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to offer any additional material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made that were not known to her. Therefore, the plaintiffs motion is correctly denominated a motion for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable (see, Matter of Lech v City of New York, 242 AD2d 301; King v Rockaway One Co., 202 AD2d 395, 396). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inzerillo v. City of New York, 287 A.D.2d 599, 731 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

287 A.D.2d 599 (Inzerillo v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Rockaway One Co.
202 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Lech v. City of New York
242 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)