Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Inzerillo v. City of New York

Inzerillo v. City of New York

287 A.D.2d 599, 731 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9872
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 22, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 287 A.D.2d 599 (Inzerillo v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inzerillo v. City of New York, 287 A.D.2d 599, 731 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as [600]*600limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated December 4, 2000, as denied her motion, in effect, for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff failed to offer any additional material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made that were not known to her. Therefore, the plaintiffs motion is correctly denominated a motion for reargument, the denial of which is not appealable (see, Matter of Lech v City of New York, 242 AD2d 301; King v Rockaway One Co., 202 AD2d 395, 396). Santucci, J. P., Altman, Florio, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Rockaway One Co.
202 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Lech v. City of New York
242 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
287 A.D.2d 599, 731 N.Y.S.2d 890, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inzerillo-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.