Inwood Post No. 581 v. State Bingo Control Commission
216 N.E.2d 707, 17 N.Y.2d 699, 269 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1473
This text of 216 N.E.2d 707 (Inwood Post No. 581 v. State Bingo Control Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Inwood Post No. 581 v. State Bingo Control Commission, 216 N.E.2d 707, 17 N.Y.2d 699, 269 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1473 (N.Y. 1966).
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Burke and Bergan. Judges Van Voorhis, Soileppi and Keating dissent and vote to reverse and to annul the determination of the State Bingo Control Commission for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mercy Hosp. v. NY SOC SERVS
79 N.Y.2d 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Mercy Hospital v. New York State Department of Social Services
590 N.E.2d 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Kuriansky v. Natural Mold Shoe Corp.
136 Misc. 2d 684 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
Sunset Taxi Co. v. Blum
73 A.D.2d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
216 N.E.2d 707, 17 N.Y.2d 699, 269 N.Y.S.2d 712, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inwood-post-no-581-v-state-bingo-control-commission-ny-1966.