Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Investor's Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. De Gaemo

Investor's Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. De Gaemo

2 Conn. Super. Ct. 63
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 25, 1935
DocketFile No. 47721
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 63 (Investor's Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. De Gaemo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Investor's Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. De Gaemo, 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 63 (Colo. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Among the other pre requisites prescribed for the entering of a Summary Judgment is that the affidavit contain a statement to the effect that the affiant believe there is no defense to the action. Practice Book, #53.

There is not such a statement in the affidavit accompanying the motion in this instance.

Under the circumstances here, would not a judgment by default be in order? See Practice Books #47 and #187.

The instant motion is denied for the reason stated, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohn v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., No. 31 97 69 (Oct. 31, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12192 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
City of Milford v. Andresakis, No. Cv94 04 71 24s (Oct. 31, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 12183 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Hratko v. Bethel Board of Education, No. 31 78 36 (Mar. 7, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 2408 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)
Szymanski v. Hartford Hospital, No. 363831 (Jan. 2, 1990)
1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 30 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/investors-mortgage-guarantee-co-v-de-gaemo-connsuperct-1935.