Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy

51 A.D.2d 952, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 23, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for the reasons stated at Special Term. Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Birns and Nunez, JJ.; Silverman, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I am unable to say that the order of the Commissioner of the Department of Rent and Housing Maintenance was not supported by substantial evidence, much less that there was no rational basis for the order, or that it was arbitrary or capricious. (Matter of Felin Assoc. v Altman, 41 AD2d 825, affd 34 NY2d 895; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329.) Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy, 51 A.D.2d 952, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 952 (Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MATTER OF FELIN ASSOCS., INC. v. Altman
316 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Colton v. Berman
234 N.E.2d 679 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Felin Associates, Inc. v. Altman
41 A.D.2d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)