Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy

51 A.D.2d 952, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 952 (Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Investors Funding Corp. v. Joy, 51 A.D.2d 952, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 23, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for the reasons stated at Special Term. Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Birns and Nunez, JJ.; Silverman, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I am unable to say that the order of the Commissioner of the Department of Rent and Housing Maintenance was not supported by substantial evidence, much less that there was no rational basis for the order, or that it was arbitrary or capricious. (Matter of Felin Assoc. v Altman, 41 AD2d 825, affd 34 NY2d 895; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329.) Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 23, 1975, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for the reasons stated at Special Term. Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Birns and Nunez, JJ.; Silverman, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I am unable to say that the order of the Commissioner of the Department of Rent and Housing Maintenance was not supported by substantial evidence, much less that there was no rational basis for the order, or that it was arbitrary or capricious. (Matter of Felin Assoc. v Altman, 41 AD2d 825, affd 34 NY2d 895; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329.) Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be reversed and the petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 952, 382 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/investors-funding-corp-v-joy-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack