Investment Industries of Florida, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Investment Industries of Florida, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation

511 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1621, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9154

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1191

StatusPublished

This text of 511 So. 2d 343 (Investment Industries of Florida, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Investment Industries of Florida, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 511 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1621, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9154 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

COWART, Judge.

We have examined the record in this case and find it insufficient to support the conclusion that the original subdivider, David Siegel, or his wholly owned corporation, Investment Industries of Florida, Inc., originally intended or “proposed” to subdivide its lands for the purpose of disposition into fifty or more lots, parcels, units, or interests, or that such lands were “offered as a part of a common promotional plan.” Therefore, such lands were not a “subdivision” or “subdivided lands” within the definition in section 498.005(19), Florida Statutes (1985), and, accordingly, appellants did not violate sections 498.023(1) or (2), Florida Statutes (1985). The final order herein dated June 6, 1986, is

REVERSED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COWART, Judge.

We have examined the record in this case and find it insufficient to support the conclusion that the original subdivider, David Siegel, or his wholly owned corporation, Investment Industries of Florida, Inc., originally intended or “proposed” to subdivide its lands for the purpose of disposition into fifty or more lots, parcels, units, or interests, or that such lands were “offered as a part of a common promotional plan.” Therefore, such lands were not a “subdivision” or “subdivided lands” within the definition in section 498.005(19), Florida Statutes (1985), and, accordingly, appellants did not violate sections 498.023(1) or (2), Florida Statutes (1985). The final order herein dated June 6, 1986, is

REVERSED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1621, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/investment-industries-of-florida-inc-v-department-of-business-regulation-fladistctapp-1987.