Investment Corp. of South Florida v. City of Hallandale

245 So. 2d 253, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3968
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1971·No. Nos. 40118, 40135·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the cases of City of Hallandale v. Meekins et al., and City of Hallandale v. Investment Corporation of South Florida (Fla.App.1970), 237 So.2d 318, passes upon a question of great public interest, we accepted jurisdiction for review pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as the decision of this

[254]*254Court. The writ, therefore, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur. CARLTON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Investment Corp. of South Florida v. City of Hallandale, 245 So. 2d 253, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3968 (Fla. 1971).

245 So. 2d 253 (Investment Corp. of South Florida v. City of Hallandale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water Dist.
755 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Madison County v. Foxx
636 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Rushfeldt v. Metropolitan Dade County
630 So. 2d 643 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Davis Water & Waste Industries, Inc. v. Embry Development Corp.
603 So. 2d 1357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. City of Florida City
411 So. 2d 976 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Home Builders v. Board of County Commissioners
4 Fla. Supp. 2d 82 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1982)