Investment Associates v. Summit Investment Associates, Inc.
34 A.3d 396, 303 Conn. 921, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 34
This text of 34 A.3d 396 (Investment Associates v. Summit Investment Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Investment Associates v. Summit Investment Associates, Inc., 34 A.3d 396, 303 Conn. 921, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 34 (Colo. 2012).
Opinion
The petition by the defendant Joseph D. Lancia for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 192 (AC 32227), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 52-598 (c) is procedural in nature, and, therefore, may be applied retroactively?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs 2009 motion to revive?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant for purposes of adjudicating the plaintiffs 2009 motion to revive?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Investment Associates v. Summit Associates, Inc.
31 A.3d 820 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A.3d 396, 303 Conn. 921, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/investment-associates-v-summit-investment-associates-inc-conn-2012.