Inversiones Menrivisa, C.A. v. Venturoso Corp.

609 So. 2d 653, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11078, 1992 WL 296044
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1992·No. No. 92-1305·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record fails to reflect any legal basis that would support the entry of the order under review herein. See Lopez-Ortiz v. Centrust Savings Bank, 546 So.2d 1126 (Fla.3d DCA 1989); Oxford International Bank and Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 374 So.2d 54 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1199 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, the order entered by the trial court on June 1, 1992, requiring the appellants “... to return the boat ... or to post a bond ...” is reversed, with this cause being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inversiones Menrivisa, C.A. v. Venturoso Corp., 609 So. 2d 653, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11078, 1992 WL 296044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 653 (Inversiones Menrivisa, C.A. v. Venturoso Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oxford Intern. Bank & Trust, Ltd. v. Merrill Lynch, Etc.
374 So. 2d 54 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Lopez-Ortiz v. Centrust Savings Bank
546 So. 2d 1126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)