Introcaso v. Rye Ford, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Introcaso v. Rye Ford, Inc.

54 A.D.2d 972, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14907

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 972 (Introcaso v. Rye Ford, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Introcaso v. Rye Ford, Inc., 54 A.D.2d 972, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover compensatory and exemplary damages for fraud, defendant Ford Motor Company appeals (by permission) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 5, 1975, which denied its motion to strike certain matter from the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The matter sought to be stricken from the complaint is relevant on the question of punitive damages and thus cannot be said to be unnecessary. Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover compensatory and exemplary damages for fraud, defendant Ford Motor Company appeals (by permission) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 5, 1975, which denied its motion to strike certain matter from the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The matter sought to be stricken from the complaint is relevant on the question of punitive damages and thus cannot be said to be unnecessary. Margett, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hawkins and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 972, 388 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/introcaso-v-rye-ford-inc-nyappdiv-1976.