Intrepid v. Pollock

Court of International Trade

Intrepid v. Pollock

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 788

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedSeptember 2, 1992

DocketCourt No. 88-04-00279

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 788 (Intrepid v. Pollock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Intrepid v. Pollock, 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 788 (cit 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Tsoucalas, Judge:

In accordance with the decision (June 22, 1992) and mandate (July 13, 1992) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 92-1057,

[789]*789It is hereby ordered that this case is remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“ITA”) to hold an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether the British Standard pipe at issue in this case is “standard pipe” or “structural tubing” within the legitimate scope of the Antidumping Duty Order at issue in this case and to reconsider its scope decision in light of any information developed at the evidentiary hearing; and it is further

Ordered that the ITA will report the results of this remand to this Court within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tsoucalas, Judge:

In accordance with the decision (June 22, 1992) and mandate (July 13, 1992) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal No. 92-1057,

[789]*789It is hereby ordered that this case is remanded to the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (“ITA”) to hold an evidentiary hearing on the question of whether the British Standard pipe at issue in this case is “standard pipe” or “structural tubing” within the legitimate scope of the Antidumping Duty Order at issue in this case and to reconsider its scope decision in light of any information developed at the evidentiary hearing; and it is further

Ordered that the ITA will report the results of this remand to this Court within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intrepid-v-pollock-cit-1992.