Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedNovember 25, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-09779
StatusUnknown

This text of Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez (Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED:___11/25/2020

Baker sHostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 T 212.589.4200 F 212.589.4201 November 24, 2020 vm Bakeriawncom ° Tiffany A. Miao direct dial: 212.589.4266

The Clerk of Court is directed to seal the Complaint, EC VIA ECF Now

. SO ORDERED: Hon. Katharine H. Parker United States District Court, + mir Southern District of New York HON. KATHARINE H. PARKER 500 Pearl St. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE New York, NY 10007-1312 11/25/2020

Re: — Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Antonio C. Fernandez, Case No.: 1:20-cv-09779 Dear Judge Parker: We represent plaintiff Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC in the above-referenced matter. Pursuant to your Honor’s Individual Practice Rule II.d, we respectfully submit this letter motion to request that the Court (1) seal the Complaint, ECF No. 1, and permit plaintiff to file a redacted version of the Complaint in the form attached to this letter as Exhibit A; and (2) permit plaintiff to file under seal an unredacted version of Exhibit A to Mr. Winchenbaugh’s declaration, ECF No. 7-1. The information plaintiff seeks to redact or has already filed as redacted in the referenced documents is narrowly limited to defendant’s personal financial compensation information. Mr. Fernandez’s personal financial compensation information was accidentally included in the Complaint. As such, a redaction is warranted here, where plaintiff is currently in the process of hiring a replacement for Mr. Fernandez and disclosure of his compensation would be prejudicial to plaintiff, and to protect Mr. Fernandez’s privacy interest. See Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. Eielson, 282 F. Supp. 3d 684, 706 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); see, e.g., Murray v. UBS Sec., LLC, No. 14 CIV. 927 (KPF), 2017 WL 1498051, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 25, 2017) (redacting salary information).

Atlanta Chicago Cincinnati Cleveland Columbus Costa Mesa Dallas Denver Houston Los Angeles New York Orlando Philadelphia San Francisco Seattle Washington, DC Wilmington

Hon. Katharine H. Parker November 24, 2020 Page 2

Counsel has conferred with defendant, and defendant consents to plaintiff's request. Accordingly, plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant its application and enter an order sealing the Complaint, ECF No.1.

Respectfully submitted,

Tiffany A. Miao

ce: John Siegal, Esq. Tina Solis, Esq. Daniel Schnapp, Esq. Christina Kurow, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. Eielson
282 F. Supp. 3d 684 (S.D. Illinois, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Intrepid Financial Partners, LLC v. Fernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intrepid-financial-partners-llc-v-fernandez-nysd-2020.