Intrastate Oil Co. v. Board of Commrs., Orange
This text of 168 A. 269 (Intrastate Oil Co. v. Board of Commrs., Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The relator attempts to have us review an order of the Supreme Court discharging a rule to show cause why mandamus should not issue to compel the issuance of a building permit and a license for the erection of a gasoline service station.
Since the constitutionality of a statute is not involved, the Supreme Court’s refusal of mandamus is not reviewable in this court. Matlack v. Lloyd, 82 N. J. L. 739; Camden v. Public Service Railway Co., 84 Id. 309.
The appeal must be dismissed.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A. 269, 111 N.J.L. 354, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intrastate-oil-co-v-board-of-commrs-orange-nj-1933.