Intrabartolo v. Intrabartolo

38 A.D.2d 711, 329 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5660
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 3, 1972·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 21, 1971, as dissolved the marriage between him and plaintiff’s intestate, nunc pro tune as of the date of the inquest, November 16,1970. Appeal dismissed without costs. A judgment resulting from an inquest occasioned by defendant’s nonappearance in answering the complaint and at the trial is a default judgment from which no appeal lies (Jensen v. Union Ry. Co. of New York, 260 N. Y. 1; Pearlson v. Javits, 19 A D 2d 729). We have, however, considered the merits and, if the appeal were not being dismissed, we would affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from (Cornell v. Cornell, 7 N Y 2d 164, 169-170). Rabin, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Intrabartolo v. Intrabartolo, 38 A.D.2d 711, 329 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

38 A.D.2d 711 (Intrabartolo v. Intrabartolo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Bush v. Flood
81 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Fishman v. Fishman
50 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)