Intner v. Morton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Intner v. Morton

1 A.D.2d 723, 146 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3743

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 723 (Intner v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Intner v. Morton, 1 A.D.2d 723, 146 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, at Special Term, Broome County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a change of venue in an action that had been consolidated. Following an automobile accident in Tompkins County three different negligence actions were commenced. The plaintiffs herein brought their action in Queens County where they resided. Two other actions were brought by other parties against the plaintiffs herein and the venue thereof laid in Broome County. Subsequently, all three actions were consolidated and the place of trial fixed in Broome County. The other two actions mentioned were settled and discontinued before the order of consolidation was filed in the office of the Clerk of Queens County, leaving pending only the action herein. The order of consolidation, therefore, did not become effective until after the need for consolidation no longer existed. We think that under these circumstances the motion to restore the venue to Queens County in this action should have been granted, without prejudice of course to any motion on the part of the defendant to move for a change of venue for the convenience of witnesses if he is so advised. Order reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted with $10 costs. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpem and Zeller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, at Special Term, Broome County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a change of venue in an action that had been consolidated. Following an automobile accident in Tompkins County three different negligence actions were commenced. The plaintiffs herein brought their action in Queens County where they resided. Two other actions were brought by other parties against the plaintiffs herein and the venue thereof laid in Broome County. Subsequently, all three actions were consolidated and the place of trial fixed in Broome County. The other two actions mentioned were settled and discontinued before the order of consolidation was filed in the office of the Clerk of Queens County, leaving pending only the action herein. The order of consolidation, therefore, did not become effective until after the need for consolidation no longer existed. We think that under these circumstances the motion to restore the venue to Queens County in this action should have been granted, without prejudice of course to any motion on the part of the defendant to move for a change of venue for the convenience of witnesses if he is so advised. Order reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted with $10 costs. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpem and Zeller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 723, 146 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intner-v-morton-nyappdiv-1955.