Intiso v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 66 N.J.L. 157 (Intiso v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case a transcript of the shorthand notes of the testimony taken in the court below is sent up as part of the return to the writ of certiorari. There is no warrant for such a practice. There should have been a rule upon the judge specifying upon what points he should certify the fact or facts. The case of Smart v. North Hudson County Railroad Co., decided at this present term, applies to this case, and the practice there indicated will be followed here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 N.J.L. 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/intiso-v-metropolitan-savings-loan-assn-nj-1901.