Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U.

Federal Circuit

Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U.

20 F. App'x 845

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedSeptember 26, 2001

DocketNo. 01-1401

StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 845 (Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U., 20 F. App'x 845 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Intex Recreation Corp. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. Metalast S.A.U. opposes in part and moves for sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal. Intex replies and opposes Metalast’s motion for sanctions.

[846]*846Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Intex’s motion to voluntarily dismiss is granted.

(2) Metalast’s motion for sanctions is denied.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI