Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U.
20 F. App'x 845
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Intex Recreation Corp. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal. Metalast S.A.U. opposes in part and moves for sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal. Intex replies and opposes Metalast’s motion for sanctions.
[846] Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Intex’s motion to voluntarily dismiss is granted.
(2) Metalast’s motion for sanctions is denied.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U., 20 F. App'x 845 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
20 F. App'x 845 (Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast S.A.U.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.