Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard

Second Circuit

Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard

145 F. 500, 76 C.C.A. 260, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 17, 1906

DocketNo. 204

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 F. 500 (Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard, 145 F. 500, 76 C.C.A. 260, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997 (2d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion is made to dismiss the writ of error which was sued out by the railway company to review the judgment considered in Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company v. Menard, opinion in which is herewith handed down (145 Fed. 498). There is nothing in the record to show summons and severance or its equivalent, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the motion must be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion is made to dismiss the writ of error which was sued out by the railway company to review the judgment considered in Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company v. Menard, opinion in which is herewith handed down (145 Fed. 498). There is nothing in the record to show summons and severance or its equivalent, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the motion must be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 F. 500, 76 C.C.A. 260, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interurban-st-ry-co-v-menard-ca2-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack