Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard

Second Circuit

Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard

145 F. 500, 76 C.C.A. 260, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 17, 1906·No. No. 204·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion is made to dismiss the writ of error which was sued out by the railway company to review the judgment considered in Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company v. Menard, opinion in which is herewith handed down (145 Fed. 498). There is nothing in the record to show summons and severance or its equivalent, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the motion must be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion is made to dismiss the writ of error which was sued out by the railway company to review the judgment considered in Holbrook, Cabot & Daly Contracting Company v. Menard, opinion in which is herewith handed down (145 Fed. 498). There is nothing in the record to show summons and severance or its equivalent, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the motion must be granted.

Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard, 145 F. 500, 76 C.C.A. 260, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997 (2d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

145 F. 500 (Interurban St. Ry. Co. v. Menard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related