Intertex, Inc. v. Walton

683 S.W.2d 599, 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 6006
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 24, 1985·No. A14-84-882-CV·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion to extend time to file the statement of facts. We find appellant failed to make a timely request for the statement of facts and, therefore, deny the motion. TEX.R.CIV.P. 377.

In order to present a statement of facts on appeal, appellant must make a written request to the official reporter at or before the time prescribed for perfecting the appeal. TEX.R.CIV.P. 377. The time for perfecting the appeal was November 30, 1984.

The motion to extend time to file the statement of facts was filed December 28, 1984. In the affidavit accompanying that motion, the court reporter avers appellant’s written request was made December 31, 1984, the day the statement of facts was due.

Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Intertex, Inc. v. Walton, 683 S.W.2d 599, 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 6006 (Tex. Ct. App. 1985).

683 S.W.2d 599 (Intertex, Inc. v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKellips v. McKellips
712 S.W.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Caldwell & Hurst v. Myers
705 S.W.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Intertex, Inc. v. Walton
698 S.W.2d 707 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)