Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.
This text of 89 A.D.2d 820 (Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term’s decision in denying the motion of defendant Hotel Constructors, Inc., for a change of venue was not an abuse of its discretion, and the exercise thereof should not be disturbed (Hurlbut v Whalen, 58 AD2d 311, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 643). In regard to the subsequent motion, to strike certain portions of plaintiff’s briefs as not being part of the record on appeal, it is granted. We note, however, that it is well established that this court is bound by the certified record on appeal and does not consider matters contained in a party’s brief which are not properly contained in the record (Matter of Slater v Village of Herkimer, 73 AD2d 1061; Charlotte Lake Riv. Assoc. v American Ins. Co., 68 AD2d 151; Mulligan v Lackey, 33 AD2d 991). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Hayes, J. — change of venue.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.2d 820, 453 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-window-cleaning-co-v-morsediesel-inc-nyappdiv-1982.