Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.

89 A.D.2d 820, 453 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17950

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 1982·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term’s decision in denying the motion of defendant Hotel Constructors, Inc., for a change of venue was not an abuse of its discretion, and the exercise thereof should not be disturbed (Hurlbut v Whalen, 58 AD2d 311, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 643). In regard to the subsequent motion, to strike certain portions of plaintiff’s briefs as not being part of the record on appeal, it is granted. We note, however, that it is well established that this court is bound by the certified record on appeal and does not consider matters contained in a party’s brief which are not properly contained in the record (Matter of Slater v Village of Herkimer, 73 AD2d 1061; Charlotte Lake Riv. Assoc. v American Ins. Co., 68 AD2d 151; Mulligan v Lackey, 33 AD2d 991). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Hayes, J. — change of venue.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term’s decision in denying the motion of defendant Hotel Constructors, Inc., for a change of venue was not an abuse of its discretion, and the exercise thereof should not be disturbed (Hurlbut v Whalen, 58 AD2d 311, mot for lv to app den 43 NY2d 643). In regard to the subsequent motion, to strike certain portions of plaintiff’s briefs as not being part of the record on appeal, it is granted. We note, however, that it is well established that this court is bound by the certified record on appeal and does not consider matters contained in a party’s brief which are not properly contained in the record (Matter of Slater v Village of Herkimer, 73 AD2d 1061; Charlotte Lake Riv. Assoc. v American Ins. Co., 68 AD2d 151; Mulligan v Lackey, 33 AD2d 991). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Hayes, J. — change of venue.) Present — Simons, J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc., 89 A.D.2d 820, 453 N.Y.S.2d 526, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

89 A.D.2d 820 (Interstate Window Cleaning Co. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related