Interstate Steel Co. v. Baird

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Interstate Steel Co. v. Baird

10 A.D.2d 843, 199 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 26, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 843 (Interstate Steel Co. v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interstate Steel Co. v. Baird, 10 A.D.2d 843, 199 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to increase the monthly payments directed to be made from $40 to $100 per month, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements of' this appeal to the judgment-creditor-appellant. On this record we find the directed payments of $40 per month to be insufficient. We further find that the judgment debtor should properly pay the sum of $100 per month to the judgment creditor, having “due regard for the reasonable requirements of the judgment debtor and his family ” and for the payments being made by him to other judgment creditors (Civ. Prae. Act, § 793). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, so as to increase the monthly payments directed to be made from $40 to $100 per month, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements of' this appeal to the judgment-creditor-appellant. On this record we find the directed payments of $40 per month to be insufficient. We further find that the judgment debtor should properly pay the sum of $100 per month to the judgment creditor, having “due regard for the reasonable requirements of the judgment debtor and his family ” and for the payments being made by him to other judgment creditors (Civ. Prae. Act, § 793). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 843, 199 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-steel-co-v-baird-nyappdiv-1960.