Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cairns

47 P. 509, 16 Wash. 215, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 37
Washington Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1896·No. No. 2397·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An examination of the record in this case satisfies us that the findings of fact made by the court below were justified by the testimony, and that the conclusions of law announced were justified by the findings. The defendants, according to the undisputed testimony, borrowed this money on the representations of an agent of the plaintiff, the obligation'which they signed was properly construed by the court, and the method of computation that was adopted was the method which carried out the intention of the parties to the contract.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cairns, 47 P. 509, 16 Wash. 215, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 37 (Wash. 1896).

47 P. 509 (Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cairns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re PUGET SOUND SAVINGS & LOAN ASS’N
49 F.2d 922 (W.D. Washington, 1931)
Groover v. Pacific Coast Sav. Society
127 P. 495 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Hale v. Stenger
61 P. 156 (Washington Supreme Court, 1900)
Interstate Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Knapp
55 P. 48 (Washington Supreme Court, 1898)