Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Masten

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Masten

750 P.2d 1163, 89 Or. App. 673

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 2, 1988

Docket86-31-CV; CA A40755

StatusPublished

This text of 750 P.2d 1163 (Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Masten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. Masten, 750 P.2d 1163, 89 Or. App. 673 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendants appeal from a judgment in an action to foreclose on a loan agreement. The judgment is not final or appealable and we dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff initiated this action and moved for summary judgment two months later. Defendants subsequently filed an answer in which they asserted several affirmative defenses and counterclaims. The court entered a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on its claim. Although plaintiff asserts that a final judgment was entered, there is nothing in the record indicating that the trial court intended its summary judgment order and accompanying judgment to decide the counterclaims. Defendants did not file their answer until after the summary judgment hearing, and plaintiff did not file a responsive pleading or submit written arguments controverting defendant’s counterclaims. The judgment did not dispose of the counterclaims and is not appealable. ORCP 67B.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendants appeal from a judgment in an action to foreclose on a loan agreement. The judgment is not final or appealable and we dismiss the appeal.

Plaintiff initiated this action and moved for summary judgment two months later. Defendants subsequently filed an answer in which they asserted several affirmative defenses and counterclaims. The court entered a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff on its claim. Although plaintiff asserts that a final judgment was entered, there is nothing in the record indicating that the trial court intended its summary judgment order and accompanying judgment to decide the counterclaims. Defendants did not file their answer until after the summary judgment hearing, and plaintiff did not file a responsive pleading or submit written arguments controverting defendant’s counterclaims. The judgment did not dispose of the counterclaims and is not appealable. ORCP 67B.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 P.2d 1163, 89 Or. App. 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-production-credit-assn-v-masten-orctapp-1988.