Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cowley

66 So. 2d 588, 223 La. 672, 2 Oil & Gas Rep. 1393, 1953 La. LEXIS 1349
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 3, 1953
DocketNo. 41315
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 66 So. 2d 588 (Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interstate Oil Pipe Line Co. v. Cowley, 66 So. 2d 588, 223 La. 672, 2 Oil & Gas Rep. 1393, 1953 La. LEXIS 1349 (La. 1953).

Opinion

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The Interstate Oil Pipe Line Company, plaintiff-appellee, relying on the provisions of LSA-R.S. 19 :13, is seeking to have this court dismiss, in so far as it suspends the execution of the judgment, the appeal taken by the defendant-appellant, Leslie A. Cowley, from the judgment of the district court decreeing a right-of-way and servitude in favor of plaintiff over defendant’s property, on the ground that the plaintiff’s right to expropriate was not seriously contested nor was the statute under which such expropriation was had, LSA-R.S. 19:1 et seq., attacked.

The record shows that the defendant not only raised the question of the right of the plaintiff to expropriate his property, but also contested the area of land demanded by the plaintiff; and in this court, by way of exception of no cause or right of action, he contests the constitutionality of LSA-R.S. 45:254 (granting to “common carrier pipe lines” the right to expropriate under state expropriation laws) on the ground that the provisions of that law infringe on guarantees of Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution of Louisiana — thus bringing the issues squarely under the holding of this court in the case of Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Wyatt Lumber Co., 221 La. 886, 60 So.2d 713, in which we held that where the plaintiff’s right to expropriate or the constitutionality of the act authorizing the expropriation is attacked, the provisions of LSA-R.S. 19:13 do not apply; and we directed the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, to grant a suspensive appeal to the defendant.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Violet Trapping Co.
176 So. 2d 425 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1965)
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. De Bouchel
117 So. 2d 94 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co.
78 So. 2d 182 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 So. 2d 588, 223 La. 672, 2 Oil & Gas Rep. 1393, 1953 La. LEXIS 1349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-oil-pipe-line-co-v-cowley-la-1953.