Interstate Fur Manufacturing Co. v. Redevelopment Agency
220 A.2d 162, 153 Conn. 746
This text of 220 A.2d 162 (Interstate Fur Manufacturing Co. v. Redevelopment Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Interstate Fur Manufacturing Co. v. Redevelopment Agency, 220 A.2d 162, 153 Conn. 746 (Colo. 1966).
Opinion
The motion by the plaintiff Harry Fogal for partial disbursement of funds on deposit with the clerk of the Superior Court in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 A.2d 162, 153 Conn. 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-fur-manufacturing-co-v-redevelopment-agency-conn-1966.