Home/Ninth Circuit/Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines

153 F.2d 1503
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 1992
DocketNo. 92-55036
StatusPublished

This text of 153 F.2d 1503 (Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, 153 F.2d 1503 (9th Cir. 1992).

Opinions

ORDER

The opinion as amended December 10, 1992 is hereby further amended by striking the amendment made December 10, 1992 and restoring the opinion, as follows:

In Slip op., p. 14392, paragraph 15 is hereby deleted and replaced by the following:

[Editor’s Note: Amendment has been incorporated within published opinion.]

With this amendment, the panel as constituted in the above case has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 85(b).

The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.

The parties are reminded of Circuit Rule 4.6.b. Inasmuch as the opinion has been restored to its October 23, 1992 form the court deems it highly improbable that the amendment affected by this order offers any ground for a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.

This court’s order granting Appellant Interstate Commerce Commission’s motion to stay the mandate expired on January 7, 1993. The Motion filed on March 8, 1993 of Appellant Interstate Commerce Commission to stay issuance of the mandate is DENIED.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mugg
202 U.S. 242 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Maxwell
237 U.S. 94 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
284 U.S. 370 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
397 U.S. 150 (Supreme Court, 1970)
North Carolina v. Rice
404 U.S. 244 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States
459 U.S. 131 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Trucking Associations
467 U.S. 354 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
467 U.S. 837 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Allen v. Wright
468 U.S. 737 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.
497 U.S. 116 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Company, Great Northern Railway Company, and Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Alouette Peat Products, Limited, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alouette Peat Products, Limited
253 F.2d 449 (Ninth Circuit, 1958)
Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Rpd, Inc. And General Motors Corporation, Intervenors
533 F.2d 411 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
In Re Leasing Consultants Inc.
592 F.2d 103 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Cross-Appellees v. San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board, Cross-Appellant
748 F.2d 266 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
In Re Ozark Restaurant Equipment Co., Inc. James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Bruce Anderson, Elmer Dale Yancey, Kenneth Eads, Robert Whiteley and Anderson Cajun's Wharf, James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Anderson Cajun's Wharf, James G. Mixon, Trustee v. Ed Yancey, Bruce Anderson and Kenneth Eads
816 F.2d 1222 (Eighth Circuit, 1987)
Maislin Industries and U.S. Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.
879 F.2d 400 (Eighth Circuit, 1989)
Delta Traffic Service, Inc., Campbell 66 Express, Inc. v. Mennen Company, F/k/a Jerhard Mennen Chemical Co., Interstate Commerce Commission
919 F.2d 134 (Third Circuit, 1990)
Delta Traffic v. Adm Mississippi
954 F.2d 721 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
970 F.2d 564 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)
Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Mennen Co.
730 F. Supp. 1309 (D. New Jersey, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 F.2d 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-commerce-commission-v-transcon-lines-ca9-1992.