Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, a Corporation Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter 7 Trustee

Ninth Circuit

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, a Corporation Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter 7 Trustee

46 F.3d 970, 77 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 184, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1995

Docket92-55036

StatusPublished

This text of 46 F.3d 970 (Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, a Corporation Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter 7 Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, a Corporation Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter 7 Trustee, 46 F.3d 970, 77 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 184, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2117 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In ICC v. Transcon Lines, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 689, 130 L.Ed.2d 562 (1995), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s affir-mance of the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellees as to the collection of the bureau rate on overdue accounts. The Supreme Court did not consider the other aspects of this court’s decision in ICC v. Transcon Lines, 990 F.2d 1503 (9th Cir.1993) (as amended). Consequently, the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the appellees is ordered REVERSED in its entirety and' the case REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with our prior decisions in this matter, as modified by the Supreme Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In ICC v. Transcon Lines, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 689, 130 L.Ed.2d 562 (1995), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s affir-mance of the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellees as to the collection of the bureau rate on overdue accounts. The Supreme Court did not consider the other aspects of this court’s decision in ICC v. Transcon Lines, 990 F.2d 1503 (9th Cir.1993) (as amended). Consequently, the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the appellees is ordered REVERSED in its entirety and' the case REMANDED to the district court for proceedings consistent with our prior decisions in this matter, as modified by the Supreme Court’s decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 F.3d 970, 77 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 184, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-commerce-commission-v-transcon-lines-a-corporation-leonard-l-ca9-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack