Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. Minor
This text of 129 N.E. 59 (Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only error properly assigned in this cause is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. This motion, or any part of it, is not set out in appellant’s brief. We are not even referred to the page in the record where said motion can be found. We are not even informed as to the substance of any of the reasons for a new trial therein set forth. No question is presented by this brief for our consideration. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Hughes (1919), 70 Ind. App. 127, 121 N. E. 546, and authorities there cited.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 N.E. 59, 74 Ind. App. 366, 1920 Ind. App. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-business-mens-accident-assn-v-minor-indctapp-1920.