Interstate Bank v. Wesley
This text of 59 So. 621 (Interstate Bank v. Wesley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Bill by the wife (appellee) to cancel a mortgage upon her lands, upon the averred theory that the debt (to the appellant bank) it was given to secure was the debt of her husband, and hence void under the letter of Code, § 4497.
From the face of the instrument, it appears that the indebtedness in question was the joint obligation of both complainant and her husband, E. J. Wesley.
The burden of proof was assumed by complainant, and was upon her, to establish the invalidity, of the mortgage according to the theory stated.
Upon reconsideration of the entire legal evidence on the issue, our conclusion is that the plaintiff has dis[188]*188charged the burden so assumed; that the debt for which the mortgage was given was not, in any part, the debt of the complainant.
The decree of the chancellor is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 So. 621, 178 Ala. 186, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/interstate-bank-v-wesley-ala-1912.