INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc. v. KENNETH HENDEL
This text of INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc. v. KENNETH HENDEL (INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc. v. KENNETH HENDEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-575 Lower Tribunal No. 17-23056 ________________
Internet Escrow Services, Inc., etc., Appellant,
vs.
Kenneth Hendel, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. Miller, Judge.
EBI Law, PLLC, and B. Elizabeth Interthal (Tampa); Garbett, Allen & Roza, P.A., and David S. Garbett, for appellant.
Stok Kon + Braverman, and Robert A. Stok, Gabriel G. Mandler and Yosef Kudan (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Briceno v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 911 So. 2d 176, 179
(Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (recognizing that Florida courts will generally enforce
choice of law provisions contained in an agreement); City of Bell v. Superior
Court, 163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 90, 100-01 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) (applying California
law which holds that for a contract’s indemnification clause to apply to first
party claims between the indemnitee and the indemnitor, “the [clause’s]
language on the point must be particularly clear and explicit and will be
construed strictly against the indemnitee”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc. v. KENNETH HENDEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/internet-escrow-services-inc-etc-v-kenneth-hendel-fladistctapp-2021.