Internet America, Inc. v. Carradine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Internet America, Inc. v. Carradine

106 S.W.3d 906, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4517, 2003 WL 21223292

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 28, 2003·No. No. 05-01-01577-CV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[907]*907OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the May 6, 2003 joint agreed motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement. As requested by the parties, without consideration of the merits, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment, we ORDER the sureties on the supersedeas bond posted by appellants Internet America, Inc., Michael T. Maples, and William 0. Hunt RELEASED, and we DISMISS this ease. As agreed by the parties, each party shall bear his or her own costs. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue the mandate forthwith. See Tex.R.Ajpp. P. 18.1(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[907]*907OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the May 6, 2003 joint agreed motion for disposition pursuant to settlement agreement. As requested by the parties, without consideration of the merits, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment, we ORDER the sureties on the supersedeas bond posted by appellants Internet America, Inc., Michael T. Maples, and William 0. Hunt RELEASED, and we DISMISS this ease. As agreed by the parties, each party shall bear his or her own costs. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to issue the mandate forthwith. See Tex.R.Ajpp. P. 18.1(c).

Internet America, Inc. v. Carradine, 106 S.W.3d 906, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4517, 2003 WL 21223292 (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

106 S.W.3d 906 (Internet America, Inc. v. Carradine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related