Internatl. Bhd. of Electrical Workers v. Vaughn Industries, Inc.

859 N.E.2d 556, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1416
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 27, 2006
Docket2006-1868
StatusPublished

This text of 859 N.E.2d 556 (Internatl. Bhd. of Electrical Workers v. Vaughn Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Internatl. Bhd. of Electrical Workers v. Vaughn Industries, Inc., 859 N.E.2d 556, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1416 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

Wood App. No. WD-06-061, 2006-0hio-5280. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 6 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry filed September 25, 2006:

“Where attorney fees are requested in the original pleadings, may a party wait until after judgment on the case in chief is entered to file its motion for attorney fees?”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict cases are Fair Hous. Advocates Assoc., Inc. (1996), 114 Ohio App.3d 104, Mollohan v. Court Dev., Inc., Lorain App. No. 03CA008361, 2004-Ohio-2118, Wengerd v. Martin (Apr. 5, 2000), Wayne App. No. 99CA0004, and Shepherd v. Shea (May 14, 1997), Summit App. No. 17974.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fair Hous. Advocates Assn., Inc. v. James
682 N.E.2d 1045 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 N.E.2d 556, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/internatl-bhd-of-electrical-workers-v-vaughn-industries-inc-ohio-2006.