International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

Third Circuit

International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 239

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 26, 1963·No. No. 14135·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners here seek to have set aside the National Labor Relations Board order which denies a motion for back pay proceedings and other relief.

Our study of the record and consideration of arguments on behalf of the parties satisfies us that there is no error in the course the Board followed in this matter. The Union was allowed every opportunity to present its views on the question of compliance and in disapproval of the settlement. The settlement agreement is in substantial accord with the provisions of the decree in our No. 12,912. The petition before us is clearly ancillary to that cause. There has been no abuse of discretion by the Board in working out the settlement of the obligations under our decree. In its settlement of the problems presented, the Board reached an admirable, practical result under all of the difficult circumstances. See Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 12,912. (International Union, etc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board) 280 F.2d 575 (3 Cir. 1960).

The petition will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners here seek to have set aside the National Labor Relations Board order which denies a motion for back pay proceedings and other relief.

Our study of the record and consideration of arguments on behalf of the parties satisfies us that there is no error in the course the Board followed in this matter. The Union was allowed every opportunity to present its views on the question of compliance and in disapproval of the settlement. The settlement agreement is in substantial accord with the provisions of the decree in our No. 12,912. The petition before us is clearly ancillary to that cause. There has been no abuse of discretion by the Board in working out the settlement of the obligations under our decree. In its settlement of the problems presented, the Board reached an admirable, practical result under all of the difficult circumstances. See Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 12,912. (International Union, etc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board) 280 F.2d 575 (3 Cir. 1960).

The petition will be denied.

International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 316 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

316 F.2d 239 (International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.