International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

Third Circuit

International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

316 F.2d 239

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 1963

DocketNo. 14135

StatusPublished

This text of 316 F.2d 239 (International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 316 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners here seek to have set aside the National Labor Relations Board order which denies a motion for back pay proceedings and other relief.

Our study of the record and consideration of arguments on behalf of the parties satisfies us that there is no error in the course the Board followed in this matter. The Union was allowed every opportunity to present its views on the question of compliance and in disapproval of the settlement. The settlement agreement is in substantial accord with the provisions of the decree in our No. 12,912. The petition before us is clearly ancillary to that cause. There has been no abuse of discretion by the Board in working out the settlement of the obligations under our decree. In its settlement of the problems presented, the Board reached an admirable, practical result under all of the difficult circumstances. See Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 12,912. (International Union, etc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board) 280 F.2d 575 (3 Cir. 1960).

The petition will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners here seek to have set aside the National Labor Relations Board order which denies a motion for back pay proceedings and other relief.

Our study of the record and consideration of arguments on behalf of the parties satisfies us that there is no error in the course the Board followed in this matter. The Union was allowed every opportunity to present its views on the question of compliance and in disapproval of the settlement. The settlement agreement is in substantial accord with the provisions of the decree in our No. 12,912. The petition before us is clearly ancillary to that cause. There has been no abuse of discretion by the Board in working out the settlement of the obligations under our decree. In its settlement of the problems presented, the Board reached an admirable, practical result under all of the difficult circumstances. See Piasecki Aircraft Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 12,912. (International Union, etc., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board) 280 F.2d 575 (3 Cir. 1960).

The petition will be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

316 F.2d 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-union-united-automobile-aircraft-agricultural-implement-ca3-1963.