International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 44 v. Construction Employers of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 44 v. Construction Employers of the Hudson Valley, Inc.

61 A.D.2d 808, 402 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 808 (International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 44 v. Construction Employers of the Hudson Valley, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen Local Union No. 44 v. Construction Employers of the Hudson Valley, Inc., 61 A.D.2d 808, 402 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

an action to recover damages predicated upon defendants’ alleged interference with certain collective bargaining agreements, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 27, 1977, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Whether the nonmember contracts were illegal, as claimed by defendants, cannot be determined from a mere reading of the complaint. Proof in that regard is required. Accordingly, liberally construed, the complaint is sufficient as a pleading. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

an action to recover damages predicated upon defendants’ alleged interference with certain collective bargaining agreements, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 27, 1977, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Whether the nonmember contracts were illegal, as claimed by defendants, cannot be determined from a mere reading of the complaint. Proof in that regard is required. Accordingly, liberally construed, the complaint is sufficient as a pleading. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 808, 402 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/international-union-of-bricklayers-allied-craftsmen-local-union-no-44-v-nyappdiv-1978.